Wild turkey vs. Butterball?

Filed under: Poultry |

raising turkeys
Image by james_gordon_losangeles
‘In the year 664 (A.D. 1215), by the grace of God, when the lord of this city of Ani was the strong and powerful Zakaria … I, Tigran, servant of God, son of Sulem Smbatorents, of the Honents family, for the long life of my lords and of their children, built this monastery of St. Grigor, which was on the edge of an escarpment and in a place full of underbrush, and I bought it with my legitimate wealth from the owners and with great fatigue and expense, I provided it with defense all around; I built this church in the name of St. Grigor Lusavoritch and I embelished it with many decorations…’
– Inscription on the eastern wall of this church
The inscription quoted above reveals that this church was commissioned by a wealthy merchant named Tigran Honents, and completed in the year 1215. As well as paying for its construction he provided it with many precious objects, including crosses, lamps, gold and silver vessels, and religious relics.
At that time Ani was under Georgian control – and this church is believed to have been devoted to the Georgian Orthodox Rite (and the frescoes within are thought to have been painted by Georgian artisans).
Design Analysis
From the outside, the domed rectangular design resembles the cathedral – but on a smaller scale. The interior plan is different and is similar to other churches from this later medieval period. It is of a type sometimes classed as a ‘domed hall’ – a single nave partitioned into three sections with a dome over the central section.
The heightened vertical proportions of this church (especially noticeable in its interior and in the steeply pitched conical roof over the dome) are also characteristic of this period.
A blind arcade runs around all four sides of the church. Ornate carvings (of animals – real and imaginary – set amid scrolling vegetation) fill the spandrels between the arcades. These form a decorative band that wraps around the whole building. A similar arcade and decorative band runs around the drum – above which runs a second band of geometric fretwork (again typical of 13th century churches).
In front of the church stands a narthex of a slightly later date, now very ruined. It was open on two sides and incorporated a chapel along its northern edge. The arched openings of the narthex were articulated with powerfully carved zigzag moulding, and rested on capitals similar to contemporary Muslim buildings.
The interior of this narthex (including the facade of the church) was covered in frescoes – a publicly ostentatious display at odds with the stern austerity of Ani’s earlier buildings, and not particularly appropriate given the city’s precarious economic and political condition in the 13th century.
Tigran Honentz was a member of one of several extremely wealthy merchant families that had amassed enormous riches (mostly through trade) and self-styled themselves "Barons". Although wealthy, they ultimately had little political and no military power to sustain their position – or Ani’s.
The Frescoes
The interior is entirely covered with frescoes of the same date as the church. They have two main themes – the Life of Christ and the Life of Saint Gregory the Illuminator (to whom the church was dedicated).
The dome contains a damaged depiction of the Ascension in the form of a bust of Christ carried by four angels, underneath which are shown Mary and the twelve Apostles.
The eastern half of the church contains scenes from the life of Christ – including the Annunciation; the Nativity; the entrance to Jerusalem; the raising of Lazarus; etc.
In the semidome of the apse is a figure of Christ, below this is a depiction of Christ in Communion with his Apostles, below this again is a row of bishops or prophets (these have been recently destroyed by whitewash).
The western chamber of the church contains 16 scenes from the life of Saint Gregory the Illuminator – including his trial before king Trdat; the various tortures inflicted upon him (including his imprisonment in a pit); the martyrdom of St. Hripsime; the baptism of King Trdat and the kings of Georgia, Abkhazia, and Caucasian Albania; etc.
Above the door to the chapel south of the apse is an unusual panel containing motifs that evoke silk textile designs of that time. Four linked medallions each enclose a simurgh, a mythical lion-headed bird from Persian legend.
As mentioned earlier, the narthex also contained frescoes – these are mostly now destroyed or badly damaged due to weathering. They are from a slightly later period than those in the church, and are different in style, having a finer and more Byzantine character to them. On the exterior wall of the church, above and to the right of the entrance, is a depiction of the Crucifixion. The Lamentation of Mary is depicted on the other side.
On the north wall of the narthex is a now very faded image of Paradise, with Isaac, Jacob, Abraham, Mary, Adam, and a Tetramorph creature guarding the Gate of Heaven. There are also figures of saints or prophets on the underside of the arches.
Recent Damage to the Frescoes
The defacing of faces in the frescoes by Muslims objecting to the depiction of images is predictable. The more accessible paintings have also been heavily damaged in recent years by tourist graffiti (both Turkish and foreign).
However the most serious damage is of a bizarre sort. In an effort to hide the graffiti damage, large areas of the frescoes have been covered in whitewash! The frescoes on the northern wall of the church were particularly badly damaged by graffiti (including a large CND symbol hacked into the plaster). To ‘tidy’ this section up the entire lower registry of paintings has simply been chipped off.
This damage occurred in the early 1990s – during the period of professor Beyhan Karama─čaral─▒’s excavations – and must have taken a considerable amount of time and effort to accomplish. It could not have been done without the use of scaffolding or ladders, and must have been officially sanctioned.

Question by Uncle Pennybags: Wild turkey vs. Butterball?
I know Butterballs are delicious. How do wild turkeys stack up? Not so much concerned with amount of meat on the bird, but taste and texture.

Feel free to answer in the comment section below

Have something to add? Please consider leaving a comment, or if you want to stay updated you can subscribe to the RSS feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.

10 Responses to Wild turkey vs. Butterball?

  1. Wild game is a lot leaner than store-bought, will have a completely different taste, and won’t be chock-full of chemicals. In short, it’ll be better.

    Bungholio
    March 20, 2014 at 1:38 pm
    Reply

  2. The wild birds, I’m told, are a little drier than farm-raised animals. So use your favorite marinade on them. (I like Italian salad dressing.)

    Dances With Mops 2 - Mop Bucket Boogaloo
    March 20, 2014 at 2:12 pm
    Reply

  3. Wild Turkey is much better than Butterball turkey’s out of the freezer. Don’t need to thaw and cook it or anything. Just pour on ice and enjoy…

    Oh lord, I’m just amusing myself before I get off work.

    utgovols80
    March 20, 2014 at 2:43 pm
    Reply

  4. Butterball all the way with some Stove Top!

    J Bubbs
    March 20, 2014 at 3:38 pm
    Reply

  5. Yeah, Butterball is just too easy.
    I can go to Walmart and get a butterball and never get my feet dirty.

    They sell beer too!

    Bro John
    March 20, 2014 at 3:38 pm
    Reply

  6. When I cook a wild turkey I cook the brest only. I can’t stand the texture and taste of the rest of the bird. I feed the rest to my dog or I use it as bait. The breast is good the rest not so much.

    tgm2h
    March 20, 2014 at 4:29 pm
    Reply

  7. I can’t believe that people would rather have a Butterball turkey over a wild one. It just proves something that an old-timer once said to me years ago – that people today have no idea what some foods are supposed to taste like.

    Can anyone really describe the taste of turkey? It’s pretty bland. That’s a store bought turkey for you. They feed the birds bland feed and raise it just so. It’s the same gripe I have about store bought tomatoes. But wild turkey? It’s going to have a much richer flavor. It may actually have a hint of taste of what it’s mostly been eating; sometimes beechnuts, sometimes acorns, other times blueberries. Yes, it’s true, I’ve dined on wild turkey that actually tasted like someone had added a blueberry marinade to it.

    Shifting gears here. What would you rather have? One of those lookalike tomatoes that you can buy at your local supermarket? Or, a garden grown beefsteak tomato that actually looks quite ugly on the outside, but tastes like…a tomato.

    No offense. But the person that recommends Stove Top Stuffing? I had that once in my life. And it tasted like the stuffing that comes out of a cheap mattress.

    pagamenews
    March 20, 2014 at 4:36 pm
    Reply

  8. as much as i like to hunt i agree stalking thru the isle at your local turkey mart is fun also,,you have to dodge the carts,,little old women with the perfume that smells a mile away,, and spend a box or 2 of shells but then your back home ,,no feathers, no mud ,,,plop it in the fridge and ,,,,,yes the smell from the oven,,,,next day it is the store bought 4 me,,,,,,

    Ed Roach
    March 20, 2014 at 5:25 pm
    Reply

  9. Best compromise is to drink the Wild Turkey while eating the Butterball.

    Russ in NOVA
    March 20, 2014 at 6:11 pm
    Reply

  10. I have found the wild turkey to be better tasting then the frozen variety. A good way to cook one is to cook it with the breast down in order to keep it from drying out so much. This method will retain the juices and it will be delicious.

    dumdum
    March 20, 2014 at 6:41 pm
    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *