Are buff orpington ducks good pets?

Filed under: Poultry |

raising ducks
Image by woodleywonderworks
Cracks are Showing
(Excerpt on why it’s no fun to be in charge of the infrastructure)

America’s tradition of bold national projects has dwindled. With the country’s infrastructure crumbling, it is time to revive it
THE Mississippi River pushed relentlessly past dozens of levees this month. Towns were submerged, their buildings tiny islands in murky water. Ducks paddled on ponds that had once been farmland. Some flooding was inevitable, given the force of the swollen Mississippi. But a poorly managed flood-defence system did not help.

For the past few years it has been hard to ignore America’s crumbling infrastructure, from the devastating breach of New Orleans’s levees after Hurricane Katrina to the collapse of a big bridge in Minneapolis last summer. In 2005 the American Society of Civil Engineers estimated that .6 trillion was needed over five years to bring just the existing infrastructure into good repair. This does not account for future needs. By 2020 freight volumes are projected to be 70% greater than in 1998. By 2050 America’s population is expected to reach 420m, 50% more than in 2000. Much of this growth will take place in metropolitan areas, where the infrastructure is already run down.

If America does not act, says Robert Yaro of the Regional Plan Association (RPA), a body that plans for the New York-New Jersey-Connecticut region, it will have the infrastructure of a third-world country within a few decades. Economic growth will be constricted, and the quality of life will be diminished.

It is not surprising that the floods have put infrastructure in the spotlight, but this time it might remain there. Droughts have shown the need for better long-term planning. Thanks to the soaring oil price, a surge in demand for buses and trains has exposed ageing transport systems in big cities and meagre investment in small ones. And the Highway Trust Fund, which provides most of the federal money for transport projects, will be at least billion in debt next year.

The private sector is hungry to invest. In May Morgan Stanley raised billion for its new infrastructure fund, Kohlberg Kravis Roberts (KKR), a private-equity firm, launched a global infrastructure practice, and Pennsylvania announced that Citigroup and Abertis, a Spanish toll-road operator, had won an auction to lease the state’s turnpike. Momentum for change exists. Will politicians respond?

America has a grand tradition of national planning, from Thomas Jefferson’s vision for roads and canals in 1808, which influenced policy for the next century (and led to America’s first transcontinental railway) to Dwight Eisenhower’s Federal Highway-Aid Act of 1956, which created the interstate system. Such plans stand in stark contrast to the federal government’s strategy today. America invests a mere 2.4% of GDP in infrastructure, compared with 5% in Europe and 9% in China, and the distribution of that money is misguided. The more roads and drivers a state has, the more federal money it receives, explains Judith Rodin of the Rockefeller Foundation, which funds infrastructure research. This discourages states from trying to cut traffic. And because the petrol tax pays for transport projects, if America drives less, there is less money for infrastructure.

Even worse is the influence of the pork-barrel. Only around 20 states use cost-benefit analyses to evaluate transport projects; of these, just six do so regularly. Alaska’s “bridge to nowhere” is an infamous result of this sort of planning. But it is not exceptional. Two months after the bridge collapsed in Minneapolis, the Senate approved a transport and housing bill that included money for a stadium in Montana and a museum in Las Vegas.

The result is disarray. America’s ageing water infrastructure is sorely underfunded: the Environmental Protection Agency forecasts an billion annual gap in meeting costs over the next 20 years. One heavy storm can cause ageing urban sewerage systems to overflow. Last summer an 83-year-old pipe in Manhattan burst, sending a geyser of steam and debris into the air. Competition for water itself has become vicious. Georgia and Tennessee are in an all-out brawl over it.

America’s transport network is similarly dysfunctional, says a recent Urban Land Institute report. Important gateways, such as the ports in Los Angeles and New York, are choked. Flight delays cost at least billion each year in lost productivity. Commutes are more dismal than ever. Congestion on roads costs billion annually in the form of 4.2 billion lost hours and 2.9 billion gallons of wasted petrol, according to the Texas Transportation Institute. Although a growing number of Americans are travelling by train, the railways are old. America’s only “high-speed” train runs between Boston and Washington, DC, on an inadequate track.

How can all this be fixed? In January a national commission on transport policy recommended that the government should invest at least 5 billion each year for the next 50 years. The country is spending less than 40% of that amount today. Yet more important than spending lots of money is spending it in better ways.

The Brookings Institution, a think-tank, recommends that America focus on metropolitan areas, or “metros”, the top 100 of which account for 65% of population and 75% of economic output. “America 2050”, led by the RPA and a committee of scholars and civic leaders, has a similar scheme for “megaregions”, or networks of metros. The federal government should do what it can to ensure that these areas, first of all, have the infrastructure they need to thrive.

Excerpt from Economist:…

Question by Gilbert: Are buff orpington ducks good pets?
I have a big backyard with lots of room for ducks which i love and i really want to get some so im wondering if there good pets or if you dont think so then please tell me about some other good ducks you like, thanks.

What do you think? Answer below!

Have something to add? Please consider leaving a comment, or if you want to stay updated you can subscribe to the RSS feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.

4 Responses to Are buff orpington ducks good pets?

  1. i like:
    peking ducks- their all white and mine are pretty nice and LOVE attention! (they liked to be flipped over like a baby and their bellies rubbed!

    call ducks- their all white like peking ducks but about half the size and are WAY louder!

    mallards- mine was pretty aggressive, but she followed me around everywhere even when she was older! their colors vary.. mine was gorgeous! i hve 3 peking ducks now but im thinking about getting abother mallard their just adorable!

    ive never had a buff orpington duck but they are gorgeous!

    June 21, 2014 at 3:08 am

  2. Most any and all domestic breeds of ducks make good backyard pets.It mainly depends on your own desires as to what you are looking for.If you are wanting ornamental there are many color variations.There are also many different sizes of ducks.Read over the various breeds,though if you are wanting yard ducks stay away from the fliers.Unless you have plans for an aviary then any duck can be kept.Ducks needs are relatively simple.Hand rearing allows for close contact as they get older.

    June 21, 2014 at 3:30 am

  3. Yes they do, If you like ducks and have an understanding of them.
    We have Pekins,Rouens, Khaki Campbells, Muscovy and a few others.
    A Rouen looks just like a Mallard it is just a bit bigger. They will tame down pretty easy if you talk to them and spend some time with them.
    Khaki are also easy to be-friend. The hen will faithfully lay an egg daily for several months if she is properly fed and watered.
    Pekins are probably the easiest to be-friend. Ducks are very social animals and the Pekin I would guess to be the friendliest. They are those white ducks.
    A Muscovy is probably the bottom of the list. They are a bit distant and have claws. They will also fly off so they are not the best pet type.
    If you buy a kids swimming pool, only if you don’t have a pond, it is really fun to watch them playing in the water.
    Hope this helps a bit, enjoy them.

    June 21, 2014 at 4:28 am

  4. I think ducks are wonderful! I really enjoyed my Rouens and my bantam ducks (call ducks). However, if you don’t have a natural pond, and decide to get a kiddie pool, you have to ensure a way for them to get into the pool and out of it comfortably. Their webbed feet and legs get injured quite easily. I used some good sized piled flat stones in and out of the pool to help. But, I would caution that they can get messy! Ducks love puddles and will play in them and use their beaks to dig in the ground. Next thing you know you’ve got a hugh mud wallow that a pig would love to bathe in!

    Just remember, although they are water creatures, it doesn’t mean they don’t require a good, warm, dry, secure place to sleep at night. Racoons, opposums, and skunks love duck meat. Keep your ducky friends safe.

    Go out and get yourself a good book about how to raise ducks. Storey’s Guide to Raising Ducks is a good start. Have fun!

    P.S. Ducks are great at getting pests out of gardens. But, you have to wait until the plants are sturdy enough to withstand being stepped on!

    Gina F
    June 21, 2014 at 5:08 am

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *